Performancing Metrics

Are Malodorous Solids Hitting Rotating Blades In Browser Wars?

by Kevin Tea on January 7, 2010

mozilla-foundation Are things going slightly awry at Mozilla? The recent news that Firefox 3.6 will be delayed for an unknown period of time –maybe as long as two or three months – means that the much vaunted V4 will probably not come onto the streets until next year. The reason for the 3,6 delay is down to bug squashing and if this is the case then Mozilla is to be applauded to getting it right rather than releasing a buggy version into the wild. However, bug squashing or whatever else might be the reason seems to be more prevalent from a software that was designed to be as bug free as possible.

firefox logo thumb Are Malodorous Solids Hitting Rotating Blades In Browser Wars? Furthermore, development on Mozilla’s Thunderbird email client seemed to take ages and even now the latest version doesn’t support the Lightning calendar bolt-on which seems to make you wonder if left hand and right hand are communicating! And before Christmas there was a flurry of news that the Firefox mobile browser was just days away … maybe I am being too impatient.

The news that Google’s Chrome browser has overtaken Safari – no big shock there – to take third place in the browser league cannot be filling the developers at Mozilla with joy, One of Firefox’s great strengths, its add on extensions, is no longer unique and extensions for Chrome are coming out thick and fast.

Also, one wonders about the historic bonds that Google and Mozilla shared in their joint battle against Microsoft and if the funding from Google maybe under threat, Google might like to give the impression of being The Good Guys but are we really going to believe they will continue to throw cash at Mozilla when Chrome could/will become the biggest contender to Internet Explorer and become webworld’s leading browser?

googlechromelogo thumb Are Malodorous Solids Hitting Rotating Blades In Browser Wars? Looking at this blog’s stats Chrome is becoming more prevalent as the browser of choice and it is easy to see why. It is fast, damned fast and the new extensions are making it more flexible and powerful without threatening that speed advantage. To be fair I have never experienced a major crash and multiple tab closures with Firefox but those in the know say that Chrome is more robust in this area and such a scenario cannot happen.

And there’s a stalking dark horse. Opera, always the bridesmaid and never the bride, is making it’s presence felt. I am told that it’s new Beta 10 is faster than Chrome. I used to be a big Opera fan – hell I even committed the unheard of sin of paying for it! – but the lack of decent and usable widgets hacked me off and it got put on the shelf to gather dust. A quick visit to the Opera site reveals the widget catalogue has grown tremendously, so the question is will Firefox be able to hang on to its second place for much longer?

What is your take on what is happening in the browser sector.

Share and Enjoy
  • StumbleUpon
  • del.icio.us
  • Facebook
  • Google Bookmarks
  • FriendFeed
  • LinkedIn
  • Technorati
  • Twitter
  • Tumblr

Related posts:

  1. Chrome Extensions Starting To Swing It For me
  2. Chrome’s Extensions Complete Firefox Challenge
  3. Can Google’s Chrome Suite Crack The Corporate Market?
  4. European Windows Users To Get Choice Of Browser – But Is It All Good News?
  5. Chrome Beta Gets Turbocharged

  • For ages I have been the die-hard Firefox supporter at the office, after most moved over to chrome with the advent of Google Wave and the GWT. I must admit, that as of last week I have fallen to the latest Chrome beta after battling to click on anything from opening too many tabs in Ff, and I am well impressed.

    I think after reading this I will check out Opera as well.
  • Ross, when Chrome first hit the streets I was very wary., There was all sorts of disk activity going on when I was doing nothing and Chrome was loaded but once I got rid of my paranoia it just got better and better. Although I am a bit of a Zen Minimalist there were certain extensions or facilities I could not do without but now Chrome offers the choice, it's a bit of a no brainer!
  • I changed back to Ff originally after the drive activity issues, glad to see they've been sorted out!
  • I'm also noticing that FF has slowed as it's got bigger and more popular. I only have one add on.

    I have noticed that a stripped down Chrome is faster than a stripped down FF.
  • My love affair with Firefox took a hit when instability set in some months ago. I plan to strip it of the add-ons some day when there is little else to do - haha.
    Chrome has been a high performance workhorse with it's lightning speed and stability.

    I also use Flock, which you hear little about, but I've had as many as 20 plus tabs open, no problem. It also has a nice social media sidebar.

    There is something about Safari that just feels so so. No real complaints but no real love either.

    At the end of the day, Chrome may outshine them all with the new add-ons.
    I see Erica mentioned IE. Called the undertaker on that dog long ago. :-)
  • I've been moving from FF to Chrome, but there are still some things that I use FF for, such as Gmail/RTM integration, and Twitterbar, but Chrome is very nice.
  • Call me a creature of habit, but I like and continue to use Firefox. Unless the others far surpass it, I'll stick with it. I'm also a Thunderbird user. I've ditched Microsoft almost completely... all except MS Publisher which I enjoy playing with.

    I'm hearing amazing things about Chrome. If I wasn't a designer who is hooked on a few simple Firefox plugins/add ons, I'd consider a switch. haha I do believe they are improving fast and will soon be one of the top two. Hopefully it'll be Firefox and Chrome... IE can just go away!!
  • I also use Thunderbird, but recently I've asked myself the question 'why?'. The features really aren't that spectacular, and I've come to the conclusion that the answer is simply that I don't know of any other free mail clients. If Kontact were to be ported to Windows, I'd use that, and if I was willing to mix work and personal mails (even just in layout), I would use Outlook 2007, but until either of those days, I guess I'll stick it out hoping it improves...
  • Ross, the thing that bugs me about the Gmail web interface is the way it uses contacts. If they could make it easier to choose multiple contacts without going through the alphabet it would make life so much easier.
  • Go on, live dangerously and at least download it and play with it for a while :-)
blog comments powered by Disqus

Previous post:

Next post: